First it sounds like an action first approach a la Tony Robbins. But I think he doesn't say that deciding neccesarily means taking action (correct me if I'm wrong).

It all comes down to having focused energy in everything you do or think (alignment), not split energy.

• So if you want to eat an apple, just decide and eat an apple. Don't think all the time about the possibility to eat a pear or a banana. Or if you can't take action or you don't want to take action at the moment, still decide that you will eat an apple in your mind. Refuse other possibilities in your head.
• If you want to be a musician, just make music and refuse other possibilites. Don't think "but what if it is the wrong decision? What if I should do something else? What if I waste my time?". Just decide to be a musician and make music or be a musician in your mind if you can't take action or don't want to take action right now.
• If you are depressed and you want to feel better, just decide that you want to do everything (take action) to make you feel better or just think better thoughts in your mind. Refuse all other possibilites. Don't split your energy with thoughts like "But how can I do it? But what if it makes me feel even worse? But how can I get attention if I just feel happy? What if life is senseless anyway?"
• If you want to eat chocolate, but you feel guilty at the same time, it's split energy. Just decide that you will eat it and not feel guilty. Or decide that you won't eat it and stay true to your decision by refusing other possibilites completely.

Most people split their energy all the time. They say things like "I want to do it, but...", "I want to think that, but...". That's the reason I believe why they don't make any progress. They have all those conflicting thoughts that split their energy.

Deciding gives clarity. And clarity gives pure thought forms. Pure thought forms attract pure desired manifestations.

There is a book on this subject "La Force-Pensée" (thought energy) edited by Servranx. Here are a few in depth ideas it contains that you may find interesting;

In humans it's the manifestation on different levels, of intelligence, memory, organizing force, intuition, intellect, spirituality, sensitivity. It's also the thought energy that gives its' specific properties to human magnetism, properties that can be varied by simple mental orientation. In animals and vegetables, its' what we name species intelligence. In minerals, we can only perceive thought energy under the aspect of material properties.

Thought energy is always linked to the physical and chemical structure of things, to their shapes, to their physical color and their etheric color. By the way that is what allows us to know the profound nature and character of a being, but don't deduce that it's a result of an intimate chemical action, of the shape, of the color. Thought energy is rather the architect, which is a reminder of the old theories of the archaea, a group of single-celled microorganisms(microbes).

update 16th march 2013

Archaea - single celled microorganism, symbol of vacuity, plenitude

You cannot really avoid making a decision, you can only avoid taking responsibility for the decision you do make. I've made many decisions (including many that would be classified as indecision) in my life that were not "The Right Path". You can only say any path is the right path if you think any destination is the right destination, in which case the word "right" is completely meaningless. I did not get to where I wanted to be because I found no way to actually make the decision to get there; the paths didn't lead to it, even though I had hoped they somehow would. Interestingly, in life, the destination is always another path so the issue of "the right path" is an issue of "the right journey".

How do you make decisions when you don't know what the real options are? Decisions work through opposition of paths: you decide X or Y. You can decide to be lean or fat because you know there is a path either way and you are either on one or the other. If you are unaware of the path, you can decide to eat something or not but you can't really decide to be fatter or slimmer because you don't know how to make that decision. In that context you can decide to search for a path to lose weight or not but only once you find the path can you decide to take it, or not. You are on a path regardless but you have no decision making power over it because you cannot distinguish between the different paths, you don't know your options.

I didn't get any benefit from the idea. It seems like meaningless nonsense to me. I'll say this again, you cannot really avoid making a decision, you can only avoid taking responsibility for the decision you do make. If whatever path you choose will lead you to the best possible outcome, that means you are moving on autopilot to the best possible outcome just by being alive because making decisions is the defining characteristic of being conscious and you were at some point in your life, conscious and made a decision.

When someone is "indecisive" they are just "unmotivated". What is really going on is that they don't particularly care about the options in front of them (within their field of consciousness). They still make a decision but it's just the path of least resistance, like when you decide which popcorn you will eat first, and then second, and then third.

there maybe many decisions
but only one path and on
that journey we go either
forward or slip backward

If you chose a path in life to be like, Ted Kazinski, Ted Bundy, or any other murders, then I wouldn't say that was the right path!

There are absolute right and wrongs in morality.

I think the statement should be, "Any path is right, as long as it is not, illegal, immoral, misguided, misjudged or just outright wrong."

I agree with Wade. Sociologists have been studying human behavior, and there are absolutes to right and wrong. If I walked naked down Main Street, people might laugh or be shocked, but the Police would take me in, because we as a people have decided that walking naked down Main Street is wrong. Perhaps on a beach in France, this would be okay, but that is also what we humans have decided is acceptable behavior. There are limits, as much as you argue against them.