@Stingray, wow, thank you so much.I have realised that I have become more an more unconcerned, but then had a moment of 'eeek, why is this showing up'. Is it not, though, still showing that I am holding onto beliefs around illness that I need to clean up?

"When you are as emotionally unconcerned about how you are creating others in your reality to be as you would be when asking someone to pass the salt at the dinner table" @Stingray, wouldn't that make life so bland as to be not worth living? If you never feel great love or great concern or great anything. Just "he is cute", "she is sick", but I am responding to that the same way as I would to asking for salt at dinner. This has been bugging me quite a bit today.

@Stingray, thank you so much for clarifying that. I admit I didn't get that distinction. This really helps.

@Stingray does it mean that even though Antheia can create a version of her sister who is not sick in Antheia's presence, her sister can still be sick ? Because after all her sister is the one who chooses to be sick or not sick, not Antheia. Confused over this point

@kakaboo - "Because after all her sister is the one who chooses to be sick or not sick, not Antheia" - In your reality, you are the creator. There is no sister other than what some part of Antheia's consciousness has determined her to be in her physical reality. While there will be a consciousness playing on the physical gameboard that plays the role of Antheia's sister, she will only intersect that consciousness in her reality according to her own vibrational interpretation.

@Stingray you mentioned before creating is more like rendezvous-ing rather than 'creating'. so I shall use that since it seems easier to understand it that way. Let's say I have a friend who got into an accident and became handicapped, and it's because I rendezvous-ed with him during that period of time that it got my attention. I could chose to forget about him and not focus on him afterwards, and his handicap may not get my attention anymore when in my presence but he's still handicapped?

@Stingray- Does a child in womb of his mother,arranged his food himself? Or The ALMIGHTY GOD arranges his food even prior to sending him to this world?

@Zee - It seems like you're making a statement, not asking a question :)

@kakaboo - "his handicap may not get my attention anymore when in my presence but he's still handicapped?" - That's just another version of the old philosophical question: "Does a falling tree in a forest make a sound if there is no-one around to hear it?" :) http://www.inwardquest.com/questions/5596/ and http://www.inwardquest.com/questions/1744 ...and even a variation of the Schrödinger's cat thought experiment.

@kakaboo - If you need to influence a vibration in order to observe it, how can you ever know what the true nature of the vibration is? It will change as you observe. It becomes an academic debate without end of whether your friend (beyond your perceived attraction/rendezvous-ing) has a bodily condition that you term "handicapped" or not. In your own physical reality, you can never know the true nature of things using your physical senses because your senses are part of "The Game"

@Stingray- haha. .no no..i am asking a question.Your insight and opinion
are very important for me.I analyse different theories in my mind.You know where i stand..:)

@Zee - If the mother is not consciously arranging "food" for an unborn child then that suggests that it is coordinated by a "Broader Perspective" that coordinates much else in physical reality. If it suits your belief system to call that "ALMIGHTY GOD" then use that term. For many people these days, a term like that would feel fear-based and disempowering, and that would be opposite to what I refer to as Broader Perspective