Now here are a set of rules I can live with :)
What do you think? asked 21 Feb '10, 23:29 Inactive User ♦♦ Barry Allen ♦♦
showing 1 of 2
show 1 more comments
|
Wow! Amazing! Simply Wonderful! I have heard of the name Dan Millman but my curiosity never bit. Even when I saw your question posted I kept ignoring it. Then feeling sorry for the abandoned "red" question that kept glaring in the middle of the screen, my compassion for it drew me in. Boy was I ever glad that I clicked on your question. These words are profound and are worthy of being framed and hung on the wall in every seeker's sanctuary. I love the fact that each statement is many levels deep. Thank You for sharing this wonderful work for the benefit of the rest of us. Thank You! I just decided to add more to this: On second thoughts, these words should be hung in a frame in a place where others can see it. It is a great conversation trigger, and I am sure all of us here will enjoy the opportunity to explain the meaning within these words to those who are curious and ready! answered 22 Feb '10, 03:34 The Traveller Funny how what we are meant to take notice of keeps presenting itself to us. I ignored this site for ages but it just kept popping up in front of my face :) The moderators might be sorry they persisted so long now :)
(22 Feb '10, 22:02)
Inactive User ♦♦
look out, Lorraine's on Inner Quest, lol
(10 Jul '11, 03:53)
RPuls
|
I'm pretty sure Dan Millman is not the author of the "Rules for Being Human" I believe it is Cherie Carter-Scott answered 22 Feb '10, 07:29 jdcotter Hi jdcotter - just did a quick google, seems some think it came from and ancient Sanskrit source, some Cherie Carter-Scott and most from "Unknown Source". I didn't realise it was so well known - there might just be something to it if so many resonate with the idea. Thanks for that lead.
(22 Feb '10, 21:58)
Inactive User ♦♦
Here is a link which makes it all much easier to read http://www.circle-of-light.com/Inspirations/rules.html
(22 Feb '10, 21:59)
Inactive User ♦♦
|
ok only thing i don't agree with is external problem being reflextion of internal state. when people stone you and you did no wrong because of there ego. it is not because of you they have free will. but you do not have to accept it or let it affect you. if the world killed jesus was it because of is internal state? if you are sitting and contemplating people from far away and one of them sneak up on you and stone you from behind is it because of your internal state? the rest is very good. answered 27 Jun '11, 06:14 white tiger |
I had a print out I copied from a community college gym I worked out at in 1996 that credited Dan Millman as the source of The Rules of Being Human. I'm curious if Dan or Cherie will respond to these claims. Tony Pedretti
link
This answer is marked "community wiki".
answered 09 Jul '11, 22:29 |
If you are seeing this message then the Inward Quest system has noticed that your web browser is behaving in an unusual way and is now blocking your active participation in this site for security reasons. As a result, among other things, you may find that you are unable to answer any questions or leave any comments. Unusual browser behavior is often caused by add-ons (ad-blocking, privacy etc) that interfere with the operation of our website. If you have installed these kinds of add-ons, we suggest you disable them for this website
Great philosophy to aspire to.
ok only thing i don't agree with is external problem being reflextion of internal state. when people stone you and you did no wrong because of there ego. it is not because of you they have free will. but you do not have to accept it or let it affect you.